Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
Home buyers have more purchasing power when mortgage rates drop.
。业内人士推荐WPS官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
Between July and September 2025, 134,760 households were living in hotels, B&Bs and flats – an increase of 6.9% on the same period in 2024.。业内人士推荐同城约会作为进阶阅读
Передачу Малышевой смотрят миллионы.Что будет, если питаться по ее заветам? Мы проверили и пожалели4 июля 2022